Brief des Geschäftsführers

Dr. Ulrich Hoppe, Hauptgeschäftsführer der AHK in London, zieht ein Fazit zur aktuellen Wirtschaftsentwicklung und ihrer Auswirkung auf die deutsch-britischen Handelsbeziehungen

August 2018

© Fotolia / Niroworld

Keine Einigung ist nicht nur eine Schlechte, sondern auch die Schlimmste!

Summer is nearly over and again, despite some apparent progress in the negotiations, every so often there is still talk of a no deal scenario. Is this talk just part of the negotiation strategy or is it a real possibility? Many say that it is only part of the negotiation strategy but the true reasons remain unknown. In addition, we do not know whether the Prime Minister will get any potential final deal through parliament. The die-hard Brexiteers might block any deal, whilst the Labour Party, out of principle, may do the same. If we do end up without a deal, the hard-line Brexiteers will also be disappointed as the UK, out of sheer necessity to minimise costly disruptions, will be forced to accept many EU regulations and principles, solely to keep trade and the economy going. One example for this is the unilateral offer being made to EU citizens to be allowed to remain in the UK whatever the outcome of the negotiations. If this offer had not been made, a no deal outcome would potentially have forced millions of EU citizens to apply for work or residency permits and visas before 30 March 2019. This task would overwhelm the UK immigration authorities and thus potentially turn many of the current EU citizens in the UK into illegal immigrants. Accepting EU health and safety standards for imports is another area where Britain would have to give ground until it has built up its own institutional framework to deal with such issues.

No deal would also lead to costly disruptions on the side of the EU. Due to the EU being unable to reciprocate British pragmatism, because of the diversity in standpoints amongst the EU27, medium and long-term uncertainty would prevail. We sincerely hope that there will be a deal, but out of precaution, we recommend that all parties inform themselves about the EU’s ‘preparedness notices’ and the UK Government’s guidance on a no deal outcome. Hyperlinks to these notices can be found on the Chamber’s webpage.

The next months will be interesting and we at the Chamber will be there to support you with any questions you might have. Feel free to get in touch.


Dr Ulrich Hoppe
Hauptgeschäftsführer
Deutsch-Britische Industrie- und Handelskammer

Juni 2018 - Es ist wieder an der Zeit zu den Verhandlungen zu kommen

The Royal Wedding was a welcome distraction for a few weeks but now it is time to get down to business again. With the Brexit deadline slowly but steadily approaching, time is running out and one does not have the feeling that this urgency is felt by everybody.

The discussions about the future customs arrangement show that there is more than one devil in the detail. Whatever the future arrangements will be, the idea of frictionless trade may well turn out to be an illusion – and this may not be the only one. Let us remind ourselves that, independent of any transition period, which still has to be finally agreed and ratified, Britain will be leaving the EU on 29 March 2019. Therefore “business as usual” will no longer apply in a significant number of instances from that day onwards, as Britain will cease to be part of many agreements the EU has concluded on behalf of all member states.

For example, EU free-trade deals with countries around the world will no longer automatically include Britain after 29 March 2019 and therefore individual solutions will have to be found and agreed by all sides.

There are many more examples, and the recent discussions about Galileo and the sharing of intelligence technology after Brexit show how difficult it will be to design a future relationship which minimises the economic and political loss for all. With the summer recess fast approaching and Brexit no longer at the top of the agenda in many EU countries, the British government urgently needs to overcome its infighting, because otherwise an unnecessarily disruptive Brexit cannot be ruled out. When I speak to colleagues from across Europe, I often hear that patience with the UK is running out and this is not a good sign. Together we are stronger and whatever the formal arrangements for future cooperation will look like, we need to work together constructively to master the economic and political challenges of which, as we all know, there are many more to come. We at the Chamber can only hope that the British government will use the coming months to unite in order to produce a proper blueprint for the future relationship it wants to have with the EU so that constructive negotiations on the all-important details can begin.

April 2018 - Die Übergangsphase verschafft nur eine vorübergehende Atempause

With the principle agreement on a transition phase some temporary relief has been granted to the business community. We all hope, or even assume, that the negotiations will go well and that the EU and the UK will be able to agree on a framework of their future relationship by the autumn of this year.

Such an agreement on the future framework is necessary for the transition period to be allowed to materialise. However, there is no guarantee that this will happen, especially as the Irish question remains unsolved. The problem is that none of the current proposals are acceptable to both sides of the negotiation, simply put: an untested, yet to be implemented electronic declaration system (together with a tolerance for some low level smuggling) versus the, for the British side, politically unacceptable continued membership in the customs union for Northern Ireland only.

An easy solution would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the (or a) Customs Union. A majority of MPs, and probably also the electorate, would be for it and this solution would also not break Theresa May’s promise that Brexit means Brexit. In this context it is worth to look at Turkey which is a member of the Customs Union but clearly not a member of the EU and nobody, be that in the EU or Turkey, thinks otherwise. In other words, there is room for compromise and it only depends on the political class to provide leadership for the best of the country.

Currently 60% of British trade is covered by the EU’s Customs Union or EU Free Trade Agreements with other countries - to endanger this means sacrificing economic growth for no apparent political gain. The argument for staying in the Customs Union becomes more compelling by the day as time is fast running out, especially as it is still unclear how the countries with which the EU currently has Free Trade Agreements will view Britain on 30 March 2019, when Britain exits the EU and thus is no longer automatically party to external EU agreements.

Let us hope that a workable compromise on membership in the or in a Customs Union can be found so that business can continue to flourish to the benefit of societies on both sides of the Channel.

Februar 2018 - Andauernde Regierungsbildung in Deutschland erschwert europäischen Dialog

Two weeks ago a new grand coalition government was agreed by Germany’s Christian Democrats, their Bavarian sister party and the Social Democrats. However, the final say on it rests with the members of the Social Democratic Party. Whether they will agree to forming another coalition government with Angela Merkel is by no means certain. Should the party members reject the proposals, we would be back to the drawing board and Germany would enter a further period without decisive leadership. The latter also appears to be lacking in the UK, and with two major European governments suffering from this condition, Brexit negotiations – at least in the short run – will not become easier.

The front cover of our forthcoming magazine, initiative, shows the port of Dover and we sincerely hope that in a year’s time the picture will be the same and that we will not see a clogged up port as a result of a no deal outcome because political leaders were unable negotiate constructively. Many on the British side had always hoped that Germany would “put in a word” for the UK so that she would get a more favourable deal than otherwise. Whether this hope was ever justified is impossible to know. If the members of the Social Democratic Party reject the coalition agreement, the political landscape in Germany will see further upheaval, and we might see a new election or a different Chancellor. Such prolonged uncertainty would not be good for Germany and the EU, as strong and stable leadership from Europe’s largest economy is important in these testing political times. 

Furthermore, many commentators view the agreed political agenda of the grand coalition as more of the same and lacking in radically new policies. Germany faces many challenges, ranging from demographics, immigration and education to digitalisation and it is important for her long-term success that these are properly addressed. Assuming the agreed coalition is confirmed by March 2018, it is crucial that further measures are introduced to make Germany more competitive and fit for the future, so that she can also play a proper part in leading Europe in an ever-fragmenting world.

Januar 2018 - Einigung über Übergangsphase wird voraussichtlich nicht Anfang 2018 erzielt

Will an agreement be reached on the framework of the future relationship between Britain and the EU? Will the vital implementation or transition phase be agreed early in 2018 or rather towards the end of 2018? These are hugely important questions for businesses, which need to have stability and want to avoid costly planning for a multitude of scenarios. Companies can deal with many outcomes as long as there is certainty about them. Therefore we can only urge all the negotiators to provide some certainty early on. Whether this wish will be fulfilled remains to be seen. The negotiations in this second phase will definitely become more difficult and we can expect the political temperature to rise over the coming months. However, it is important in this negotiation “game” not to shut too many doors. We owe future generations the opportunity and the freedom to develop and live in a European framework of their liking.

Let me make a prediction at this point in time. I know it is always dangerous to do so but an agreement on the transition phase and its length will most likely not come early in 2018. It will happen rather later in the year because to some negotiators it is still not yet obvious that a two-year implementation phase will not be long enough to establish a final settlement on Britain’s relationship with the rest of Europe. Therefore a structure and a wording has to be found so that this phase can be extended or superseded by a new one, which will essentially be an extension of the one to be agreed this year. At the end of this “extension”, four or five years down the line, we will have had a new election in the UK, and also many new leaders will have been elected on the continent. This next generation of leaders will hopefully bring fresh thinking to the table. Truly fresh thinking should be applied by all sides before a more permanent decision about Britain’s future in or with Europe and also Europe’s future is taken. Like it or not, we live in an ever more interdependent world and crucial decisions should be taken responsibly, with more facts and potential consequences taken into consideration.

In any case, if we look at global developments over the medium term, we see that despite many upheavals, the world overall has become more open and the rule of law has become more prominent. The basic principles of living, working and interacting with each other as well as the approach to tackling problems has in many cases become more structured and similar across the globe. In whatever global or European framework we will live in future, this trend – of course with ups and downs – is going to continue and it will create an ever stronger need to cooperate. It would be more efficient to organise this cooperation on a multilateral rather than on a bilateral level but this will hopefully be for future leaders to decide. Therefore let’s remind current leaders not to rush into permanent decisions too quickly.

Dezember 2017 - Brexit Verhandlungen gehen in die zweite Runde - die Erleichterung in der Deutsch-Britischen Wirtschaft ist deutlich zu erkennen, jedoch bleibt ein „No Deal“ weiterhin als Möglichkeit

The German-British business community welcomes Brexit negotiations moving on to the second phase, because it is only in this phase that a clearer picture of the future relationship between the EU and the UK will emerge.

Despite the impression gained from the media, the first phase of drawing up the Brexit bill, sorting out the rights EU citizens in the UK and British citizens in the EU as well as agreeing on a framework for the island of Ireland was relatively straightforward.

Over the next nine to twelve months, when both parties need to agree on the future, we will find out that, as ever, the devil lies in the detail and many more difficult compromises will have to be made on both sides.

Will the Prime Minister be able to sell these compromises to her own party? That remains to be seen – we can only hope that she will have the stamina to do so and to continue to lead Britain through the negotiations as any change in leadership will create even more upheaval. However, looking at the political landscape we might still easily end up with a ‘no deal’ scenario, even if unintentionally. This would have disastrous consequences in the short-term for both sides, but more so for the UK than for the EU.

Of course in the longer term Britain will be able to adjust, but to paraphrase the Economist’s Matthew Symonds, I expect that Britain’s economic prospects will still be good but far smaller than they have been. Therefore despite the current positive news, companies still need to consider a ‘no deal’ scenario as part of their Brexit strategy and in the short term they should focus on analysing their value added chains, logistics and warehousing capacities, tax and customs implications.

We at the German-British Chamber hope that, in the end, this will largely be an unnecessary exercise and that the second phase will be concluded with a transition agreement lasting for a number of years to enable a final settlement which works for all to be negotiated successfully – but don’t hold your breath!

November 2017 – Mehr Klarheit ist dringend notwendig

At the time of writing we do not yet know when the real negotiations about the future relationship between the UK and the EU will begin but one does have the feeling that not much real progress has been achieved so far.

We all thought that the “no deal is better than a bad deal” scenario had finally been buried after the Prime Minister’s speech in Florence. Unfortunately, this does not always appear to be the case. The impression is that reality has not yet fully sunk in with the British negotiators as, apart from lofty visions about a future relationship with the EU, not much real substance has been provided so far.

Theresa May’s recent comments on the uncertain future status of EU citizens in the UK were also not overly helpful and have not been well received by many of the 3 million EU citizens living and working in the UK. This continued insecurity will contribute to making the country a less attractive place for foreign talent, possibly resulting in a negative effect on the longer-term economic potential of the UK as it is unlikely that the skills provided by recent immigrants can easily be replaced by home-grown talent.

On the other hand, the EU needs to show some more flexibility in terms of coming to an agreement with the UK. For example, it is difficult to sort out the Northern Ireland border issue if it is not clear what kind of trading arrangement both parties will enter into once Britain has left the EU.

It is important to note that if significantly more clarity about the future direction is not provided by the end of this or the beginning of next year, more and more international companies will have to implement contingency plans for their operations in the UK. British companies will have to do the same for their operations and activities on the continent. These will be costly exercises, which will have a negative impact on the economy, especially in the UK. Therefore, in addition to showing a higher degree of flexibility on the part of the EU, we can only urge the British government to develop a clearer and realistic approach to what it wants the future to look like – to have your cake and eat it was never and will never be a realistic outcome.

Dr Ulrich Hoppe
Director General
German-British Chamber of Industry & Commerce